By D. Edgar Brannon

This publication covers Fokker's early years and his creation of assorted types of / the Fokker Eindecker sequence, the E.I, E.II, E.III, and E.IV. those plane / brought a brand new measurement to struggle - air wrestle. / / contains: "Fokker Eindecker In Action," by way of D Edgar Brannon - 50 Pages / / good points: / **Color: Don Greer Illustrator: J Sewell & R Toepfer / **Brief heritage lesson (Antony Fokker and his early years) / **Black and White pictures w/captions (brief description of every photo) / **Diagrams and necessities of the various planes / **Includes photographs of Fokker monoplanes (M.6, M.5, and the M.8 (AI) / **Planes flown by means of the German military / 2/6/96sk

Show description

Read or Download Fokker Eindecker PDF

Similar military technology books

Yuma. The Marines Mean Machine

A backstage at the WORLD'S significant AIRBASES. colour images

Sturmgeschutz III in action

''''''Sturmgeschutz III In motion

Israeli Air Force 1948 to the present

Israeli Air strength 1948 to the current КНИГИ ;ВОЕННАЯ ИСТОРИЯ Издательство: palms & Armour PressСерия: Warbirds Illustrated 023Автор(ы): Yehuda BorovikЯзык: EnglishГод издания: 1984Количество страниц: 73ISBN: 0-85368-620-3Формат: pdfРазмер: eighty three. three mbRapid1Rapid2 fifty one

Extra resources for Fokker Eindecker

Example text

Threat is commonly taken to mean that set of activities and purposes aimed at doing harm. Although this definition may be thought to specifically refer to the threat of terrorism, it actually applies to natural hazards and catastrophic accidents as well. A discussion of threat can be broad indeed. Conventionally, terrorism threat is generally dissected into two components: namely, intent (to perform an act) and capability (resources, including intellectual, to accomplish the act). Recent work by Williams [1, 2] adds a third dimension (or metric), at least to radical jihadist terrorism, namely, authority.

Gorelick, J. , Roemer, T. , Thompson, J. R. (2004). W. , New York, pp. 423–428 (total pages). 16. S. Department of Homeland Security (2005). , February 2005, pp. 38–39 (total pages 1–35). 17. S. Department of Defense (2005). , June 2005 pp. 36–38 (total pages 1–40). 18. National Science and Technology Council (2006). Interagency Working Group on Cyber Security and Information Assurance. Federal Plan for Cyber Security and Information Assurance Research and Development , National Science and Technology Council, Washington, April 2006.

660. 14. Merriam-Webster online dictionary. com/, 2008. 15. Lewis, H. W. (1990). Technological Risk . WW Norton & Company, New York, p. 353. 16. Schneier, B. (2006). com/politics/security/ commentary/securitymatters/2006/06/71152. -B. (2005). Trends in Terrorism. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, p. 75. Garcia, M. L. (2006). Vulnerability Assessment of Physical Protection Systems. Elsivier, Amsterdam, p. 382. Haimes, Y. Y. (2004). Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management. John Wiley & Sons, New York, p.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.58 of 5 – based on 48 votes