By Shane S. Bush
The yank mental organization released a revision of the moral ideas of Psychologists and Code of behavior in 2002.This textual content, a better half to the 2002 textual content moral matters in medical Neuropsychology by means of Bush and Drexler, provides the reader with universal moral demanding situations in neuropsychology. this article examines the variations among the 1992 and 2002 APA Ethics Codes as they relate to neuropsychological activities.The authors current situations and talk about moral concerns relating to neuropsychological perform with a number of sufferer populations and in a number of scientific settings. furthermore, moral concerns in neuropsychological study and attempt improvement are tested. The textual content additionally contains chapters on rising and especially hard features of neuropsychological perform, reminiscent of the evaluate of reaction validity, and using details know-how and telecommunications. by using case illustrations, the authors study moral matters in neuropsychology and the hot Ethics Code, supplying a pragmatic technique for figuring out and selling moral neuropsychological perform.
Read or Download A Casebook of Ethical Challenges in Neuropsychology PDF
Similar medical ethics books
This e-book explores the scope, software and position of clinical legislation, regulatory norms and ethics, and addresses key demanding situations brought through modern advances in biomedical study and healthcare. whereas aware of nationwide advancements, the instruction manual helps an international point of view in its method of scientific legislation.
This booklet used to be first released in 1994. Ever because Plato, human replica has been an issue for philosophical hypothesis. The final twenty years are not any exception. fairly the opposite: fresh technological revolutions in the box of human replica has provoked between philosophers mirrored image and ongoing controversies.
This ebook serves to unite biomedical ideas, which were criticized as a version for fixing ethical dilemmas by way of putting them and knowing them throughout the viewpoint of the phenomenon of well-being care dating. as a result, it attributes a potential unification of virtue-based and principle-based techniques.
Sufferer autonomy is a far mentioned and debated topic in scientific ethics, in addition to in healthcare perform, scientific legislation, and healthcare coverage. This publication presents an in depth and nuanced research of either the concept that of autonomy and the primary of recognize for autonomy, in an available sort. the original characteristic of this ebook is that it combines empirical study into health center perform with thorough philosophical analyses.
- Introduction to Medical Ethics: Patient's Interest First
- Racial Hygiene: Medicine Under the Nazis
- Pragmatist Ethics for a Technological Culture
- The Human Microbiome: Ethical, Legal and Social Concerns
- Great feuds in medicine : ten of the liveliest disputes ever
Extra resources for A Casebook of Ethical Challenges in Neuropsychology
Monitor on Psychology , 34 (7) , 70–72. L. (1995). The ethics code and neuropsychological assessment practices. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology , 10 (1) , 27–46. L. ) (2002). Ethical issues in clinical neuropsychology . Lisse, NL: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers. N. (2003). The 2002 APA Ethics Code: Select changes relevant to neuropsychology. Bulletin of the National Academy of Neuropsychology , 18 (2) , 1–2 & 7–8. Canadian Psychological Association (2000). Canadian code of ethics for psychologists—third edition .
A casebook of ethical challenges in neuropsychology 12 Trial Consultant The trial consultant assists one side of a forensic neuropsychological case in determining the strengths and weaknesses of the neuropsychological case presented by the other side. The trial consultant does not testify, and his or her identity may be unknown to the opposing side. Treating Doctor Traditionally, the term “Treating Doctor” has been applied to any neuropsychological services (evaluation or treatment) performed in a clinical context.
The roles of neuropsychologists, as with other medical fields, have commonly been defined as either “Treating Doctor” or “Forensic Expert” 1 (Fisher, Johnson-Greene, & Barth, 2002; Macartney-Filgate & Snow, 2000). However, it seems that this distinction could benefit from re-examination and further elaboration and clarification. In addition, the role of “Trial Consultant” is included as an area of professional neuropsychological activity. Although understanding the distinctions between roles and avoiding engaging in multiple roles with one client is important for maintaining ethical conduct, it is also necessary to attend to intrarole conflicts that may interfere with objective presentation of neuropsychological evidence to the trier-of-fact.